The Ten-Year Touched Five Percent, and That Number Reprices Almost Everything

The ten-year Treasury yield reached 4.999% on September 14, its highest since October 2023. The thirty-year sat at 5.354%, the two-year at a fifty-two-week high near 4.66%, and the seven-year at 4.90%. Every maturity that matters is now within a rounding error of five percent.

A five handle on the ten-year is not an interesting statistic. It is the discount rate underneath mortgage pricing, corporate borrowing, pension funding, real estate valuation and the present value of every distant dollar of profit an equity is supposed to produce.

Sponsored by Omnia Research

8 years of retirement savings in a week?

Editor’s Note: Hedge fund legend Larry Benedict managed money for the Saudi Royal Family, the Bank of New York, and the Canadian government. He now says he’s spotted a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to profit from one overlooked ticker. Click here for details or read more below.

Dear Reader,

What if you could catch up on eight years of retirement savings…

In a single week?

Sounds impossible.

But hedge fund legend Larry Benedict has been showing everyday Americans how…

Using a strategy pulled straight from a major market scandal.

Back in 2020, one ticker crashed to historic lows.

Everyday Americans piled in, sure they’d found the trade of a lifetime.

Instead, Wall Street found a way to siphon their money out of that very ticker.

Retail investors lost 75%.

Wall Street pocketed $286 million.

How?

Larry recently sat down with me…

To show how the same method can be used by anyone with a brokerage account.

He ran a hedge fund Barron’s rated in the top 1% worldwide.

But he’s sick of the little guy getting bulldozed.

So he’s giving away the strategy — and the ticker — completely free.

His readers already had the chance to use it…

To collect $2,482… $7,623… and even $8,704 from that single ticker.

Want to know how?

Click here to watch the interview right now.

Regards,

Kimi Weintraub
Host, The Vienna Cartel

What the ten-year actually governs

The thirty-year mortgage is priced off the ten-year plus a spread, which is why mortgage rates have been sitting near 6.7% while the federal funds target range is 3.50% to 3.75%. Homebuyers are not paying the Fed's rate; they are paying the bond market's.

Investment grade corporate borrowing works the same way. A company refinancing debt issued when the ten-year was near 1.5% is not comparing its old coupon to today's policy rate, it is comparing it to today's ten-year plus a credit spread. That arithmetic is the whole of the corporate maturity wall, and it does not improve unless the ten-year falls.

Equity valuation is the least visible channel and the most consequential. A higher discount rate reduces the present value of cash flows most for the companies whose profits sit furthest in the future, which is why long-duration growth tends to lead the way down when yields spike and why defensives with near-term cash flows hold up better.

The stock and bond correlation people relied on is gone

Whitmore's Watchlist:
IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF): Intermediate Treasuries, positioned exactly where this repricing has been most visible.
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF): The broad investment grade market, which tells you what a standard bond allocation has actually been doing.
LQD(iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF): Corporate credit, where the yield is the Treasury rate plus a spread that can widen at the wrong moment.

For most of the past three decades, a 60/40 portfolio worked because bonds rose when equities fell. That relationship depended on inflation being the thing that was under control and growth being the thing that wasn't. In an inflation-led selloff, both sides fall together, which is what has happened repeatedly this year.

That does not make bonds a bad holding. It makes them a different holding. At a five percent yield, a Treasury is doing what a Treasury is supposed to do: paying a real return above a 3.4% headline inflation rate, with no credit risk. What it is not doing is hedging your equities.

The practical consequence is that diversification has to come from somewhere else, and the candidates are less convenient: short duration, real assets, cash at the front end, and sectors whose earnings rise with rates rather than fall.

Whether five percent is the top

The case that it is rests on inflation. Core CPI printed at 2.4% annually in August, its lowest since 2021, and a five percent nominal yield against that core rate is a generous real return by any historical standard.

The case that it is not rests on supply and on the term premium. The government continues to issue heavily at the long end, the Fed is not absorbing it, and the extra yield investors demand for holding thirty-year risk has been climbing rather than falling. That is a slow, structural force and it does not care what any single inflation print says.

Worth noting too that the whole curve moving together is unusual. When only the front end rises, the market is pricing policy; when the long end leads, it is pricing inflation or supply. Right now the two-year, seven-year, ten-year and thirty-year are all at or near their highs for the year, which says the repricing is about the level of rates in general rather than about the timing of the next decision.

Between those, the useful thing is not a forecast but an inventory: knowing how much of your portfolio depends on the ten-year falling, and how much of it gets paid if the ten-year stays here.

Whitmore's Take: At five percent, Treasuries pay a real return but no longer cushion equities. Worth checking whether your bond allocation is there for income or for insurance, because right now it can only deliver one of the two.

Disclaimer
The content in this email does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. All commentary is general in nature and is not directed at any individual investor.

Written by Daniel Whitmore
Millionaire Insiders